Skip to main content
Verdictia

AI contract review assistant · Canada

Verdictia analyzes contracts. Decide what to negotiate.

The Verdictia app helps law firms and legal teams detect risky clauses, missing protections and version changes, with a summary ready for professional validation.

View a sample analysis

Assistive AI · human validation · contracts are not used to train models.

Dynamic criterionA business criterion becomes an analysis ready to run.

From a title and description, Verdictia generates the right prompt, applies the criterion to the contract and returns usable analysis.

MSA · v3Master Services Agreement
Review in progress
7.2

Limitation of liability

The Supplier's total liability is limited to fees paid during the last three months, excluding any indirect damages...

8.1

Confidentiality

Each Party agrees to preserve the confidentiality of information shared in connection with the Services for a period of five (5) years...

French & English
Application storage in Canada
Verifiable sample analysis
Contracts are not used to train models

Sample analysis

On a dense contract, Verdictia shows what to verify and why.

In this product example, a client requirement, an internal rule or a precise review angle becomes an analysis criterion. Verdictia applies it to the contract and surfaces the points to validate, with the context needed to decide.

Targeted analysisQualify impact, not just detect changes.

Comparison becomes risk-oriented analysis: what improved, what weakened and what still needs negotiation.

Product view

An inspectable contract profile, not a generic AI answer.

Verdictia turns the contract into a navigable profile: parties, obligations, sensitive clauses, deadlines and vigilance areas. Each element can be opened to retrieve the detail, source and context useful to review.

Structural profileThe contract structure remains inspectable.

Extracted details preserve a clear link between clause, qualification and elements to validate.

Risk-oriented comparison

Compare the received version to the reference template. Verdictia shows what matters.

In this example, the current v2 is reviewed against the v1 template. Verdictia does more than highlight changes: it explains the contractual effect, separates a similar clause from a significant modification and produces comparison comments tied back to the source passages.

Version comparisonThe v2 is reviewed against the template, clause by clause.

Verdictia aligns the current version with the reference, qualifies meaningful changes and turns deviations into actionable comparison comments.

Structured analysis, from clause to negotiated version.

  1. Document

    The contract becomes readable

    Verdictia starts from the document and its review context, without turning the public site into a product manual.

  2. Analysis

    Risk is structured

    Obligations, sensitive clauses and negotiation points are organized to support a decision.

  3. Verification

    The source remains visible

    The analysis must be reviewable, challengeable and validated by the professional.

  4. Comparison

    Versions reveal what truly changed

    Verdictia helps qualify differences between versions: improvement, regression, unchanged risk or point to renegotiate.

  5. Negotiation

    The decision becomes actionable

    Outputs help decide what to accept, negotiate, explain or escalate.

What Verdictia produces to decide and negotiate.

Sourced risk clauses

Identifies sensitive passages, links the observation to the contract text and leaves a verifiable trace for human review.

Contract map

Organizes parties, obligations, deadlines, exceptions and sensitive areas instead of letting review scatter.

Version comparison

Distinguishes concessions obtained, weakened protections, unchanged risks and points still open.

Ready-to-use comments

Turns detected risk into a clear observation that can be used in a recommendation or negotiation.

Positions to defend

Prepares what to accept, reframe, escalate or keep open depending on risk level.

Shareable summary

Summarizes issues and decisions for a client, committee, partner or business team.

Direct comparison

Not a GPT. Not a CLM. A structured reading of risk.

Three approaches, three very different outcomes on the same contract or two versions. Verdictia is neither a free-form conversation nor a lifecycle tool: it is a decision-oriented, traceable and negotiable reading of risk.

Generic GPTFree-form conversation
Classic CLMLifecycle
VerdictiaContract review
Sources linked to the contract
Free-form, unsourced answers
Document metadata
Observations linked to the text when verifiable
Risk-oriented version comparison
Summarized differences, unstable framework
Tracked versions, weak risk qualification
Changes qualified by negotiation impact
Risk reading
Generic, unprioritized summary
Workflow and statuses
Risks qualified and prioritized
Decision négociable
Conversation, not a decision
Lifecycle, not analysis
Actionable points ready to negotiate
Controlled confidentiality
Public models, reusable data
Varies by vendor
Canada storage · no training

Built for reviews where risk, negotiation and traceability matter.

Pre-signature reviewSaaS contractsNDAs and MSAsVendor contractsVersion comparisonContract due diligenceNegotiation preparationCommercial contractsSummary for legal leadership

Law firms

Identify genuinely negotiable risks faster, with structured analysis that remains under professional control.

In-house counsel

Know what to accept, negotiate, escalate and explain to business teams under volume pressure.

Legal departments

Establish a more consistent, traceable and decision-oriented review method across the team.

Trust

Controlled AI for reviews that require confidentiality and control.

Verdictia supports review and decision preparation; it does not provide standalone legal advice. AI outputs may be imperfect and must be verified by a qualified professional.

Discuss security and confidentiality

Data and training

Client contracts are not used to train models.

Application hosting

Application data and contract storage in Canada. AI inference controlled through AWS Bedrock, with policies configurable to client requirements.

Professional control

AI assists review; the professional keeps verification and final decision-making.

Review traceability

The analysis is designed to remain linked to the contract, criteria and available sources.

Structured pilot

A short pilot to measure value on your real review cases.

We frame the contracts to test, confidentiality requirements, success criteria and expected outputs together. The goal: verify whether Verdictia concretely improves risk prioritization and negotiation preparation.

What you test

Templates, anonymized examples or real matters under an approved framework.

What you receive

Prioritized risks, negotiation points and summaries ready to challenge.

What we measure

Quality, relevance, traceability and usefulness for your legal workflows.

Ideal profile

Law firms, in-house counsel and legal departments with recurring reviews.

Direct answers to trust questions.

No. Verdictia assists contract review. It helps identify, structure and prioritize risks, but validation, professional judgment and the final decision remain human.

No. Client contracts are not used to train models. Verdictia is designed around confidentiality, data control, human validation and traceability.

Yes. Verdictia is designed for cabinet-grade review: structured, verifiable and useful for preparing observations, negotiation points and summaries to deliver or challenge.

Yes. Verdictia helps legal teams prioritize risk, respond more clearly to business teams and standardize contract review.

Verdictia is relevant for commercial contracts, SaaS agreements, vendor contracts, NDAs, MSAs and other documents requiring structured review of risks, obligations and sensitive clauses.

Yes. Verdictia helps compare versions through a risk lens: concessions obtained, weakened protections, secondary rewording and points that remain to negotiate.

A test can be discussed within an approved framework: template contracts, anonymized examples or real matters depending on confidentiality requirements and pilot scope.

Verdictia is designed for review workflows in French and English, with particular relevance for professionals operating in Canada and Quebec.

A structured review: risks, obligations, sensitive clauses, negotiation points, summary and links to available contractual sources where context allows.

The best candidates are dense enough to justify real prioritization: SaaS, vendor, commercial, MSA, complex NDA or diligence documents.

Request a structured pilot. The discussion qualifies contract types, confidentiality requirements, review scope and success criteria.

Next step

Turn your next contract review into a defensible decision.

Personalized discussion for law firms, in-house counsel and legal teams. Testing possible on templates, anonymized examples or real matters under an approved framework.