Limitation of liability
The Supplier's total liability is limited to fees paid during the last three months, excluding any indirect damages...
AI contract review assistant · Canada
The Verdictia app helps law firms and legal teams detect risky clauses, missing protections and version changes, with a summary ready for professional validation.
Assistive AI · human validation · contracts are not used to train models.
From a title and description, Verdictia generates the right prompt, applies the criterion to the contract and returns usable analysis.
The Supplier's total liability is limited to fees paid during the last three months, excluding any indirect damages...
Each Party agrees to preserve the confidentiality of information shared in connection with the Services for a period of five (5) years...
Sample analysis
In this product example, a client requirement, an internal rule or a precise review angle becomes an analysis criterion. Verdictia applies it to the contract and surfaces the points to validate, with the context needed to decide.
Comparison becomes risk-oriented analysis: what improved, what weakened and what still needs negotiation.
Product view
Verdictia turns the contract into a navigable profile: parties, obligations, sensitive clauses, deadlines and vigilance areas. Each element can be opened to retrieve the detail, source and context useful to review.
Extracted details preserve a clear link between clause, qualification and elements to validate.
Risk-oriented comparison
In this example, the current v2 is reviewed against the v1 template. Verdictia does more than highlight changes: it explains the contractual effect, separates a similar clause from a significant modification and produces comparison comments tied back to the source passages.
Verdictia aligns the current version with the reference, qualifies meaningful changes and turns deviations into actionable comparison comments.
Verdictia starts from the document and its review context, without turning the public site into a product manual.
Obligations, sensitive clauses and negotiation points are organized to support a decision.
The analysis must be reviewable, challengeable and validated by the professional.
Verdictia helps qualify differences between versions: improvement, regression, unchanged risk or point to renegotiate.
Outputs help decide what to accept, negotiate, explain or escalate.
Identifies sensitive passages, links the observation to the contract text and leaves a verifiable trace for human review.
Organizes parties, obligations, deadlines, exceptions and sensitive areas instead of letting review scatter.
Distinguishes concessions obtained, weakened protections, unchanged risks and points still open.
Turns detected risk into a clear observation that can be used in a recommendation or negotiation.
Prepares what to accept, reframe, escalate or keep open depending on risk level.
Summarizes issues and decisions for a client, committee, partner or business team.
Direct comparison
Three approaches, three very different outcomes on the same contract or two versions. Verdictia is neither a free-form conversation nor a lifecycle tool: it is a decision-oriented, traceable and negotiable reading of risk.
Identify genuinely negotiable risks faster, with structured analysis that remains under professional control.
Know what to accept, negotiate, escalate and explain to business teams under volume pressure.
Establish a more consistent, traceable and decision-oriented review method across the team.
Trust
Verdictia supports review and decision preparation; it does not provide standalone legal advice. AI outputs may be imperfect and must be verified by a qualified professional.
Discuss security and confidentialityClient contracts are not used to train models.
Application data and contract storage in Canada. AI inference controlled through AWS Bedrock, with policies configurable to client requirements.
AI assists review; the professional keeps verification and final decision-making.
The analysis is designed to remain linked to the contract, criteria and available sources.
Structured pilot
We frame the contracts to test, confidentiality requirements, success criteria and expected outputs together. The goal: verify whether Verdictia concretely improves risk prioritization and negotiation preparation.
Templates, anonymized examples or real matters under an approved framework.
Prioritized risks, negotiation points and summaries ready to challenge.
Quality, relevance, traceability and usefulness for your legal workflows.
Law firms, in-house counsel and legal departments with recurring reviews.
No. Verdictia assists contract review. It helps identify, structure and prioritize risks, but validation, professional judgment and the final decision remain human.
No. Client contracts are not used to train models. Verdictia is designed around confidentiality, data control, human validation and traceability.
Yes. Verdictia is designed for cabinet-grade review: structured, verifiable and useful for preparing observations, negotiation points and summaries to deliver or challenge.
Yes. Verdictia helps legal teams prioritize risk, respond more clearly to business teams and standardize contract review.
Verdictia is relevant for commercial contracts, SaaS agreements, vendor contracts, NDAs, MSAs and other documents requiring structured review of risks, obligations and sensitive clauses.
Yes. Verdictia helps compare versions through a risk lens: concessions obtained, weakened protections, secondary rewording and points that remain to negotiate.
A test can be discussed within an approved framework: template contracts, anonymized examples or real matters depending on confidentiality requirements and pilot scope.
Verdictia is designed for review workflows in French and English, with particular relevance for professionals operating in Canada and Quebec.
A structured review: risks, obligations, sensitive clauses, negotiation points, summary and links to available contractual sources where context allows.
The best candidates are dense enough to justify real prioritization: SaaS, vendor, commercial, MSA, complex NDA or diligence documents.
Request a structured pilot. The discussion qualifies contract types, confidentiality requirements, review scope and success criteria.
Next step
Personalized discussion for law firms, in-house counsel and legal teams. Testing possible on templates, anonymized examples or real matters under an approved framework.